| This Safety and
Health Information Bulletin is not a standard or regulation, and
it creates no new legal obligations. The Bulletin is advisory in
nature, informational in content, and is intended to assist
employers in providing a safe and healthful workplace. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act requires employers to comply
with hazard-specific safety and health standards. In addition,
pursuant to Section 5(a)(1), the General Duty Clause of the Act,
employers must provide their employees with a workplace free
from recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious
physical harm. Employers can be cited for violating the General
Duty Clause if there is a recognized hazard and they do not take
reasonable steps to prevent or abate the hazard. However,
failure to implement any recommendations in this Safety and
Health Information Bulletin is not, in itself, a violation of
the General Duty Clause. Citations can only be based on
standards, regulations, and the General Duty Clause. |
Introduction
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) have recently completed a
national survey of respirator use in the private sector.1
The results of that survey are currently being analyzed and prepared
for publication. However, one finding suggests that many employers
may not be exercising the proper care necessary to prevent a type of
fatal accident that can result from improper use of air-line
respirators. This Safety and Health Information Bulletin is to alert
the reader to fatalities that have occurred due to the inadvertent
connection of air-line respirators to inert gas supplies.
Background
Based on information obtained from Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) investigation reports from 1984 through 1995
and more recently from the BLS, OSHA determined that most worker
fatalities involved regulatory and procedural violations and could
have been prevented by proper training and compliance with existing
regulations.1,2,3
A number of the deaths indicated that coupling compatibility
problems and lax supervisory oversight were major factors in the
inappropriate supply of non-respirable gas to the respirators worn
by these workers.
OSHA regulation (29 CFR 1910.134(i)(8)) and the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) standard Z88.2, "Practices for
Respiratory Protection," specify that respirator air-line couplings
must be incompatible with outlets for
other gas systems to prevent inadvertent servicing of air-line
respirators with non-respirable gases or oxygen.
If an inert gas (e.g., helium, argon, nitrogen) is inadvertently
supplied to an air-line respirator rather than breathable air, the
results can be fatal. Inert gases such as helium, argon, and
nitrogen are widely used in industrial settings as fire suppression
blankets for flammable work in confined spaces, to operate pneumatic
equipment, and to prevent oxidation in industrial processes.
Air-line respirators are typically used in painting, cleaning, some
manufacturing operations, and abrasive blasting. An air-line
respirator, whether configured with a hood, helmet, coverall, or
facepiece, must have a hose with terminal detachable couplings. When
a respirator’s air line is connected to a source of inert gas rather
than to breathable air, the respirator wearer who trusts his/her
sense of breathlessness to determine whether he/she is connected to
breathing air has little warning before losing consciousness. This
is because the buildup of carbon dioxide, not a lack of oxygen,
ordinarily causes the sensation of breathlessness that may alert the
individual wearing the respirator. Consequently, the victim is
fooled because there is no clear indication that anything is amiss.
Blackout occurs quickly, without warning.
Victims wearing respirators connected to inert gas lines are in a
zero percent oxygen atmosphere, and unconsciousness can occur in
about 12 seconds2
and death in a matter of minutes. The situation continues to be
critical because victims are still wearing respirators and continue
to breathe inert gas after they collapse.
Case Histories
Some case histories that appeared in the referenced articles are
presented below:
Case #1
An employee was using an air hammer to chip residue out of a furnace
at an aluminum foundry. He was wearing an air-line respirator. Two
compressed gas lines with universal access couplings were attached
to a nearby post. The one on the right was labeled “natural gas.”
The gas line on the left had a paper tag attached with the word
“air” handwritten on it; however, this line actually contained pure
nitrogen. A splitter diverted one part of the gas stream to the air
hammer and the other part of the stream to the air-line respirator.
The employee was asphyxiated and killed when exposed to pure
nitrogen.
Case #2
A contractor crew was assigned to abrasively blast inside a reactor
vessel at a petrochemical refinery. Although verbal company policy
called for contractors to supply all breathing air, this crew, with
supervisor’s knowledge, had on several occasions used plant air to
supply breathing air. A crew member mistakenly hooked up his
air-line respirator to an unlabeled nitrogen line (only the shut-off
valve was labeled) used by the refinery for purging confined spaces.
Plant nitrogen and air lines were identical, and both had couplings
compatible with the coupler on the respirator.
Case #3
An employee hooked the fresh air line of his supplied-air respirator
into a plant’s compressed air lines and began abrasive blasting. The
plant operators, unaware that their plant air was being used as
breathing air, shut down the fresh aircompressor for routine,
scheduled maintenance and pumped nitrogen into the system to
maintain pressure and control the valves in the refinery. The
employee was overcome by the nitrogen in the air lines and died of
nitrogen asphyxia.
Case #4
An abrasive blaster at an air separation plant could not obtain
breathing air from an installed line. He adapted unapproved hoses
with quick-disconnect couplers so he could connect an
abrasive-blasting respirator to a gas line supplying the blasting
pot. This piping was not color coded nor labeled in accordance with
company policy. The employee died because he did not know he was
connecting to a nitrogen line instead of to compressed air. Nitrogen
was a separation by-product at this plant and was piped to operate
pneumatic equipment.
Case #5
A contract employee was abrasive blasting and painting gratings and
railings. The air-line from the abrasive blasting respirator was
hooked into the plant air supply. The plant air supply was not Grade
D breathing air and was to be used only for valve gauges and
pneumatic tools. The air compressor was shut down for maintenance,
so nitrogen was backfed into the plant air lines. No one from the
company informed the contract employee that the lines now contained
nitrogen. When the abrasive blaster donned the abrasive-blasting
respirator, he inhaled the nitrogen and was asphyxiated.
Discussion
Individuals responsible for the use of air-line respirators are
urged to review their respiratory protection programs to ensure that
the couplings of the respirator air lines are incompatible with any
other fittings used at the worksite. To ensure this requirement is
met, the non-respirator connections must be changed. (The fittings
of an air-line respirator are tested and approved by NIOSH as part
of the unit. A user cannot make an unapproved change to the
respirator.)
Plant safety and health personnel should ensure (determine) that
nothing other than Grade D air can enter the breathing air system.
The NIOSH approval label found on all air-line respirators specifies
that approval is valid only when supplied with Grade D breathing air
or equivalent. This is also required by the OSHA respiratory
standard and the ANSI Z88.2 standard.
There must be a concerted engineering effort to design and maintain
separate gas distribution systems for breathable air, and for
pneumatic tools, fire suppression, and other work-related needs, so
that improper gas interconnections cannot be made. Implementing
color coding and labeling for all gas lines is a good safety
practice that should be followed to ensure that mix-ups do not
occur.
Quick Connectors
The diagram in Figure 1 shows the proper method of coupling sections
of air supply hose using locking quick disconnects, which are easily
connected by pushing the plug and socket together. To separate, the
plug and socket must be pushed together and the sleeve on the socket
retracted from the plug.
Figure 1. Quick Connector Diagram
Quick connectors allow the supply hoses to be connected to
specific gas connection points. Insertion into an incorrect
outlet is prevented by the use of different shapes for mating
portions, different spacing of mating portions, or some
combination of these. |
Conclusion
To help ensure that workers do not inadvertently hook up to inert
gas supplies, the following recommendations should be implemented:
- Ensure that all requirements related to respiratory protection
as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.134 are met. Written standard operating
procedures governing the selection and use of respirators must be
developed and implemented. Requirements for training and
instruction in the proper use of respirators and their limitations
must be met at all facilities.
- Ensure (determine) that the couplings of the respirator air
lines are incompatible with any other couplings/fittings for
nonrespirable air or gas delivery systems. Replace couplings on
non-breathing air systems with another, incompatible type of
coupling.
- Ensure that breathable air systems are not in any way
interconnected to nonbreathable air systems.
- Develop a maintenance procedure to address supply-line
identification (labeling) and painting. Stress the purpose of
color coding and the importance of completing detail painting in a
timely fashion to ensure that this visual cue is always available
to aid workers.
References
- U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC). Survey of Respirator Use
and Practices, 2000.
- Hudnall, J.B.; Suruda, A.; and Campbell, D.L.
Deaths Involving Air-Line Respirators
Connected to Inert Gas Sources. American Hygiene
Association 54(1): 32-35 (1993).
- Suruda, A.; Milligan, W.; Stephenson, D.; and Sesek, R.
Fatal Injuries Involving Respirators,
1984-1985. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 18(4):
289-292, 2003.
|