 |
 |
 |
|
Researchers are testing the feasibility of
using radar technology to detect mold behind gypsum wallboard. They
are using a signal processing algorithm and high-sensitivity,
laboratory-size radar system recently developed by the Georgia Tech
Research Institute.
Georgia Tech Photo: Gary Meek |
|
Researchers are testing the feasibility of using radar technology to
detect mold behind gypsum wallboard. A common problem, hidden mold can
cause serious structural damage and health problems before homeowners
discover it.
Hoping to develop a non-destructive and less expensive method than is
now available to detect mold behind walls, Georgia Tech Research
Institute (GTRI) scientists are collaborating with humidity control
expert Lew Harriman of Mason-Grant Consulting in a two-year feasibility
study primarily funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) through its Healthy Homes Initiative. The
Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Technology Institute in Washington,
D.C., and Munters Corporation in Norcross, Ga., are also providing funds
for the study.
"Mold is a common problem, especially in humid, southern climates, but
people are often not aware of it because it’s occurring behind a painted
or wallpapered wall," said GTRI research scientist Victor DeJesus. "Then
it’s too late when they realize it. The wallboard must be replaced."
In addition to degrading structures, mold can emit smelly and
potentially harmful compounds into the air, DeJesus added.
Researchers are conducting experiments on damp, mold-infested wallboard
panels. Initially, they are using a signal processing algorithm and
high-sensitivity, laboratory-size radar system recently developed by
GTRI principal research scientist Gene Greneker and senior research
scientist Otto Rausch.
They will determine the feasibility of using millimeter-wave, extremely
high-resolution radar to detect mold in these panels based on unique
characteristics of the mold backscatter signature, extracted by unique
signal processing techniques. Also, Harriman will investigate the
possibility that X-ray and gamma-ray technologies might work. And later,
the researchers will examine the effectiveness of these techniques in
detecting mold in other indoor building materials, including ceiling
tiles typically used in commercial structures.
Ultimately, the researchers hope to produce a small, handheld prototype
unit - something akin to a stud finder - to lay the technical foundation
for a commercial product that contractors could purchase for about
$1,000 to $2,000 and easily learn to use. They would then test that
prototype in actual houses.
Radar expert Greneker envisions a system that would map mold behind a
wall. If dampness is indicated by the radar-based device, then a
contractor could know more precisely where to probe for damage, he
explained.
"We think this technology is on the cutting edge for detecting mold
behind walls," Greneker said. "Its potential is immense."
In an initial experiment that began in January 2004, researchers used a
small panel of wallboard -- which is very porous -- soaked in water and
injected with non-toxic fungal spores. In one month’s time, those spores
germinated as the wallboard was kept in a high-humidity environment.
Mold thrives in damp wallboard because of its paper-based encasing,
DeJesus explained.
Researchers then used the radar system to scan the wallboard panel, and
they were encouraged by the early results. Now, they are tweaking the
algorithm to enable the radar system to discriminate between the mold
backscatter signature and nails, boards and wiring that would be found
in and behind wallboard, Greneker said. They must also find ways to
reduce the system’s cost, while retaining its sensitivity, he added.
This experiment and a larger-scale one that began this spring simulate
what might happen to wallboard dampened by a home’s leaking pipe or
roof, or from condensation formed by a HVAC system, or even from
high-humidity conditions, DeJesus said.
If left unattended, mold can destroy structures and cause serious health
problems. The researchers cite a well-known case in which a jury awarded
$32 million in damages to plaintiffs in Texas who sued over a
neurological condition and asthma their doctors attributed to mold in
the home they purchased.
In less serious cases, the consequences can still entail a lengthy and
costly repair process, the researchers say. A contractor must pinpoint
the damaged area by drilling holes in the wall. Rotting wallboard,
insulation and, perhaps, studs must be removed, the area dried and then
decontaminated before new wallboard can be installed.
|